Women and men often have very different labor market experiences. Women are paid less per hour, work fewer hours outside the home, and enter different occupations than men.
These differing experiences in turn generate a host of other disparities, including lower levels of wealth, reduced retirement security, and more limited access to work-linked social safety net programs like unemployment insurance.
Labour market discrimination
We as a society cannot afford to squander the talents and skills of people who could be participating more fully in the economy. The figure below gives a sense of how the hourly wage gap has evolved in recent decades for typical workers, showing that we have made substantial but incomplete progress in narrowing the gap. While this improvement is welcome, the continuing male wage advantage may be surprising in light of the strides women have made in educational attainment. Given the strong wage premium commanded by postsecondary degrees, one might have expected the gender wage gap to decline more dramatically.
Even after controlling for differences in age, race, education, and occupation, women now earn roughly 85 percent of what men earn.Labour's Sex Discrimination isn't Working
Women still tend to work in very different jobs than men, and occupational segregation has changed little over the last two decades, as shown in the figure below. While the lack of recent progress is not fully understood, we do know that occupational segregation is linked to a number of factors including the need for job flexibility, social norms, and labor market discrimination, among others.
The separation of men and women into different occupations can have important implications for wages, given that women are disproportionately represented in lower-paid occupations.
It is not entirely clear whether this is because women are excluded from high-paid professions or because once an occupation is dominated by women it becomes lower paid. Regardless, this segregation contributes to women earning less and may make it harder for some women to enter certain fields. As shown in the figure below, this decline was most pronounced for those with a high school degree or less, whose participation fell from a peak of 71 percent to 62 percent in Weakening demand for low-skilled labor has played an important role in this development, just as it has with declining participation of low-skilled men.
The U. Achieving this goal is an urgent macroeconomic concern: without the full and unfettered involvement of women in our labor force, economic growth will be unduly hampered, the benefits of growth will be unequally shared, and a great deal of human potential will be squandered.
Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.We review theories of race discrimination in the labor market. Taste-based models can generate wage and unemployment duration differentials when combined with either random or directed search even when strong prejudice is not widespread, but no existing model explains the unemployment rate differential. Models of statistical discrimination based on differential observability of productivity across races can explain the pattern and magnitudes of wage differentials but do not address employment and unemployment.
At their current state of development, models of statistical discrimination based on rational stereotypes have little empirical content. It is plausible that models combining elements of the search models with statistical discrimination could fit the data.
We suggest possible avenues to be pursued and comment briefly on the implication of existing theory for public policy. Lehmann, Development of the American Economy. Economic Fluctuations and Growth. International Finance and Macroeconomics. International Trade and Investment. Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Gender in the Economy Study Group. Illinois Workplace Wellness Study. The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.
The Science of Science Funding Initiative. Candidates are evaluated based on their research records and their capacity to contribute to the NBER's activities by program directors and steering committees.
SlideShare Explore Search You. Submit Search. Home Explore. Successfully reported this slideshow. We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Upcoming SlideShare. Like this presentation? Why not share! Sample essay on examples of gender Embed Size px. Start on. Show related SlideShares at end. WordPress Shortcode. Moh'd A Follow. Published in: EducationCareerSpiritual. Full Name Comment goes here. Are you sure you want to Yes No. I did and I am more than satisfied. Mercy Clifford You can ask here for a help. Use with pleasure! Scott Filostin I can advise you this service - HelpWriting.
No problem. No Downloads. Views Total views. Actions Shares.The human capital explanation of sex differences in wages is that women intend to work in the labor market more intermittently than men, and therefore invest less. This lower investment leads to lower wages and wage growth.
The alternative "feedback" hypothesis consistent with the same facts is that women experience labor market discrimination and respond with career interruptions and specialization in household production.
This paper explores the relationship between self-reported discrimination and subsequent labor market interruptions to test this alternative hypothesis, attempting to remove biases associated with using data on self-reported discrimination. The paper provides evidence consistent with the feedback hypothesis. Working women who report experiencing discrimination are significantly more likely subsequently to change employers, and to have additional children or a first child.
On the other hand, women who report experiencing discrimination, and who consequently have a greater tendency for career interruptions of these types, do not subsequently have lower wage growth. Development of the American Economy. Economic Fluctuations and Growth. International Finance and Macroeconomics. International Trade and Investment. Productivity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship. Gender in the Economy Study Group. Illinois Workplace Wellness Study.
The Oregon Health Insurance Experiment.
The Science of Science Funding Initiative. Candidates are evaluated based on their research records and their capacity to contribute to the NBER's activities by program directors and steering committees. New affiliates must hold primary academic appointments in North America.This paper examines sources of gender pay disparity and the factors that contribute to this pay gap.
Many researchers question the role of discrimination and instead attribute the residual pay gap to gender differences in preferences. The main issue considered in this paper is whether gender differences in choices, especially with respect to the family and household, are indeed responsible for the gender pay gap, or whether discrimination plays a role.
On balance, the evidence indicates that sex discrimination remains a possible explanation of the unexplained gender pay gap. This is consistent with the continuing high profile sex discrimination litigation suggestive of on-going inferior treatment on the basis of sex.
Women have made huge advances relative to men in the labor force, occupational status, and educational attainment, but women continue to earn less than men. While the gender pay gap has narrowed, a substantial gap remains.
Sex Discrimination in the Labor Market examines sources of this pay disparity and the factors that contribute to this gap. Whether sex discrimination plays a role in the gender pay gap is a topic of considerable debate. Many researchers question the role of discrimination and attribute the residual pay gap to gender differences in preferences, especially with respect to balancing work with family responsibilities.
Sex Discrimination in the Labor Market shows that sex discrimination contributes to the unexplained gender pay gap, which is consistent with high profile sex discrimination litigation suggesting continuing bias in the labor market on the basis of sex.
Export citation Select the format to use for exporting the citation. Free Preview: Download extract Share. Journal details.
Racial Discrimination in the Labor Market: Theory and Empirics
Download article In this article: 1 Introduction. Abstract This paper examines sources of gender pay disparity and the factors that contribute to this pay gap. DOI: Book details. ISBN: Table of contents: 1. Evidence on discrimination based on observed productivity or stock market response. Sex Discrimination in the Labor Market Women have made huge advances relative to men in the labor force, occupational status, and educational attainment, but women continue to earn less than men.Gender gaps are one of the most pressing challenges facing the world of work today.
Globally, women are substantially less likely than men to participate in the labour market, and once in the workforce, they are also less likely to find jobs than men. Indeed, their access to quality employment opportunities remains restricted. Overall, for example, women are more likely to work longer hours than men when both paid and unpaid work is taken into account.
Moreover, when in paid employment, on average, women work fewer hours for pay or profit either because they opt to work part-time or because part-time work is the only option available to them.
Using data from the ILO-Gallup surveythe World Employment and Social Outlook — Trends for Women report assessed the extent to which personal preferences, socio-economic constraints, and gender role conformity were driving gender gaps in the labour market. The analysis by ILO economists, covering countries and territories, found the following: Having a spouse or partner reduces the probability for women to participate in the labour market in emerging, developed and the Arab States and Northern African ASNA countries.
This latter finding highlights the economic necessity to work, despite partnership status, in developing countries. Women suffering from severe poverty are more likely to participate, irrespective of gender norms. In developing countries, the probability of participating in the workforce increases by 7.
In ASNA countries, it decreases the probability to participate by 6. Having children, however, has a small negative effect on participation but it is not significant; in fact, in developing countries, there is a small positive effect 0. Limited access to safe transportation is the greatest challenge to participation that women face in developing countries, reducing their participation probability by Religions embody a complex system of values that extends to gender roles.
In developing countries, the probability to participate is substantially reduced by religion, a proxy indicator for more restrictive gender role conformity.
In developed and emerging countries, the results are mixed: in some cases the effect is positive, in others negative. A comprehensive approach to address the multiplicity of challenges is merited in order for women to realize and achieve their full economic empowerment.Labour market discrimination is defined as a situation where workers or groups of workers are treated differently in terms of recruitment, pay, benefits and promotion from other workers or groups due to their non-economic characteristics, including gender, race, religion and age.
This means that while workers may be equally productive, they are not treated the same. Treatment may be positive, where certain groups are favoured, or negative, where groups are treated less favourably. In terms of demand, negative discrimination will lead to employers downgrading the expected value of employment of a particular group, and hence reducing the expected MRP, and shifting the demand curve to the left.
The effect of this is to reduce the wage rate of the group discriminated against, as well as reducing employment prospects. Also, some workers who fear they may be discriminated against may not seek employment in those firms that they perceive practice discrimination. Hence they do not supply their labour to those types of firms. This shifts the potential supply curve to the left, and raises the relative wage rate of the favoured group. Despite various Acts of Parliament, including the Equal Pay ActSex Discrimination Actand Employment Protection Actconsiderable pay differences exist — though not all can be attributed to discrimination.
There are several policies that could be used to help reduce discrimination. A report by the OECD suggested the following:. The economy is one of the major political arenas after all. Many economies are at the brink of collapse, as companies struggle to stay afloat. World governments Arbitrage Price Theory vs. Capital Asset Pricing Risk is inevitable for all types of assets, but the risk level for assets can vary. Fortunately, even though no one can Most businesses have never been financially worse off, and many have had to file for bankruptcy When the Labour market discrimination Labour markets Labour market discrimination.
Discrimination Labour market discrimination is defined as a situation where workers or groups of workers are treated differently in terms of recruitment, pay, benefits and promotion from other workers or groups due to their non-economic characteristics, including gender, race, religion and age. Discrimination — effect on demand and supply In terms of demand, negative discrimination will lead to employers downgrading the expected value of employment of a particular group, and hence reducing the expected MRP, and shifting the demand curve to the left.
A report by the OECD suggested the following: Long-term investment in education and training to prepare people better for the labour market.
Structural reforms to promote stronger and more sustainable economic growth which can boost demand for workers, creating a more competitive environment that forces managers to drop discriminatory hiring and promotion practices. Specific anti-discrimination legislation backed up by effective enforcement.
Enforcement agencies should be empowered, even in the absence of individual complaints, to investigate companies and sanction employers when they find evidence of discrimination.